Antitrust And Monopoly: The stated purpose of antitrust laws is to protect competition and the public interest. But do such laws actually restrict the competitive process, harming consumers and serving the special interests of a few politically-connected competitors?

Is antitrust law a necessary defense against the predatory business practices of wealthy, entrenched corporations that dominate a market? Or does antitrust law actually work to restrain and restrict the competitive process, injuring the public it is supposed to protect? In this breakthrough study, Professor Armentano thoroughly researches the classic cases in antitrust law and demonstrates a surprising gap between the stated aims of antitrust law and what it actually accomplishes in the real world. Instead of protecting competition, Professor Armentano finds, antitrust law actually protects certain politically-favored competitors. This is an essential work for anyone wishing to understand the limitations and problems of contemporary antitrust actions.

Does Verizon's new ad make you laugh? | Technically Incorrect ...

True 100% free market capitalism does not allow for things like antitrust and monopoly prevention. Like this 2 people like this comment. by jaguar717 August 20, 2010 12:24 PM PDT: "Antitrust": - Charge more than your competitors? ...

Anti-Antitrust

I'm actually reading Antitrust and Monopoly: A Policy Failure at the moment, it's an excellent work. 15 EG August 20, 2010 at 2:11 am. No the dust-bin example wasn't to compare for capital-intensive industries. It was to demonstrate the ...

A Tribute to Joseph M. Belth « Breadwinners' Insurance

First in February 1973 testimony before Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly of the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary, repeated in IF many times over the years, i.e., IF 8/94 issue. “There is a saying that nature abhors a vacuum. ...

Corruption in the Pharmaceutical Industry is a Minimal Risk ...

Administered Prices: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate (86 Cong., I and 2 ses.), Parts 14 through 26 (1960-1961), Kefauver hearings; ...